People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about natural world?
It is true that people nowadays critically lack comprehension of nature. A number of factors can be held responsible for this worrying phenomenon which can be tackled by certain measures.
There were two reasons for the public low awareness of the essence of the environment. One factor is the general public’s heedlessness towards such a subject. In modern world, people are bombard with up to the minute news about issues which have immediate impact on their life such as economic development, education or healthcare. Therefore, problems such as environmental degradation, ozone layer depletion, possible alternative sources or bio-diversity are mostly not even close to desire to know of many. Besides, the education system and traditional transmission of knowledge at school could also be blame for. To be more specific, stemming from student’s ambitions to apply for top-tier institutions, curriculums tend to highly emphasis on important subjects such as sciences, languages. As a result of this unjust prioritization, lessons on natural world would inevitably sidelined or completely abstracted, resulted in student’s neglect of this issues.
However, this circumstance could be alleviated by practical solutions. Firstly, people are encouraged to expose to the visual inputs from mass media. It is possible for youngsters immerse themselves in the natural breathtaking scenery and broaden their horizon of its significance thank to the state-of-the-art cinematic effects in films and documentaries. Another instance is that infographic posters which features brief fats compounded with attractive demonstration should be made omnipresent in public spaces such as city parks or bus stations to raise people attention. Secondly, mainstream academic contents should be incorporated with lessons or extracurricular activities. Furthermore, students should take part in well-organized competitions about the environment problems or short-term field-trips to wildlife reserves.
In conclusion, there are several reasons explain the lack of understanding about nature can be explained by some reasons, but proper solutions can be carried out to help people gain their knowledge about the natural world around them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 889, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'sideline'
Suggestion: sideline
...ssons on natural world would inevitably sidelined or completely abstracted, resulted in s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 963, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., resulted in student's neglect of this issues. However, this circumstance cou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88307692308 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3702267583 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652307692308 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5558415181 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241594987904 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630199692547 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809793958803 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159923344251 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992524022617 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.