The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

The number of travelers using three airports in New York and its change from 1995 to 2000 are represented in the graph. Basically, we can see that the total number of people coming to New York seems to have increased during 5 years.

If we look at the number of travelers using John F. Kennedy airport, the number had increased up to 1997; however, it steadily decreased by about 25% (from 47 million to 36 million) in 1998. While the number was resurgented in 2000, it did not reach to that in 1997.

On the other hand, the number of people using LaGuardia airport had kept increasing between 1995 and 2000. Especially, the number increased by 20 million in 2000, which resulted in that the number in 2000 amounts to 69 million, which is almost three times the number in 1995.

Finally, the number of people using Newark airport had also increased during 5 years. While the number in 1998 and 1999 exceed that of John F. Kennedy airport, the total number of travelers in 5 years seems to be less than that of two other airports.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55614973262 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31327775414 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1679674549 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373963469272 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169669275667 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113531700476 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252218705159 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841103689948 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.64 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.