The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates how children travelled to school using different means of transport system in the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, most of the children preferred walking while going to school in 1990, while most of the students used cars at the end of the period. Walking, Cycling and using a school bus the major modes of transportation for earlier children. In contrast, travelling by car had become more common for 2010 children.
Walking is the primary source of transportation among students in 1990 with more that 10 million trips during the year. Nonetheless, it contributed to only 6 million trips in 2010. Bus rides, cycling contributed almost similarly in 1990 with around 7 million trips. A mix of Walking and taking a bus ride accounted for just under 6 million trips in 1990.
Car trips increased by around 7 million in 2010. In contrast, walking trips and a mix of walking and taking a bus ride have reduced to half of their original value by the end of the period. Cycling trips saw a drastic decline by three times between the years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nonetheless, similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83152173913 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62093483048 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516304347826 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0643161125 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8181818182 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224695111377 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977938075177 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744391764943 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162988639807 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088154730508 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.