The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates data about, how many incidents and injuries that were recorded per 100 million passengers who travelled by five different means of transportation in the year 2002.

Overall, Demand Response contributed for the highest number of incidents and injuries, while Commuter rail recorded very low accidents and wounds.

In Detail, as regards Demand Response, there were over 250 incidents recorded, which is highest among all other transportation systems. It also accounted for nearly 175 injuries, this figure is also the highest among other means. Both Light rail and Bus responsible for almost 75 accidents each, but the injuries recorded by the Bus incidents are double the value of Light rail.

Heavy rail mishaps accounted for 50, while the number of injuries is nearly same as that of Light rail with just under 50. The lowest incidents and injuries of all the transportation types are recorded by Commuter rail with just under 25 mishaps and wounds respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with just under 50. The lowest incidents and injuries of all the transportation t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, as regards

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33544303797 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72963904908 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.03764935 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163060780686 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810941367934 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815628426028 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115211375771 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891729189696 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.