The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.https://iotcd

Essay topics:

The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

https://iotcdn.oss-ap-southeast-1.aliyuncs.com/2018-07/RAT4%20t2.png

The bar chart represents the numbers of incidents and injuries occurred due to the transportation type in 2002. The transportation facilities including commuter rail, heavy rail, light rail, bus and demand response.

Overall, the demand response is the top rated in case of both incidents and injuries than rail and bus incidents, but the minimum incidents occurred due to the commuter rail while comparing the heavy rail and light rail.

According to the bar graph, the demand response taken the higher position fo incidents and injuries accounted for 250 and 175 per 100 million passenger miles travelled by transportation type in 2002 respectively. When bus incidents and light rail incidents happened nearly 75, the injuries was only at 70 and 40 respectively

Similarly, the commuter rail incidents and heavy rail incidents were less while comparing to light rail and demand response, but it also caused almost 50 and 10 per million PMT.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, similarly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 33.7804878049 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28289473684 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84563620819 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.219660207 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.6 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189467050227 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140957414015 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103169911164 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136149343431 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726825388101 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.