The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph depicts information on the instances of accidents and transportation related injuries in 2002. The study is measured according to a million passenger miles traveled (PMT).
Overall, it can be seen that light trail and bus accounted the most number of accidents in 2002 while injuries related to commuting using a bus was more common. It is also clear that the given incidents required more response than the injuries during the same year.
In detail, in 2002, the highest number of transportation incidents was observed for light rail and bus with a similar rate of about 75 Million per passenger miles travelled (PMT). This was followed by commuting on a heavy rail which had 50 Million per PMT while commuter rail had about 20 Million per PMT which was about 50 Million less than that of the incidence rate for light rail and bus.
Concurrently, injuries that happened while riding a bus occurred the most with about 60 Million per PMT. This was followed by light and heavy rail which had about 40 Million per PMT while injuries related to commuter rail posted the least number at about 20 Million per PMT. By comparison, this figure is similar to that of the accidents on the same rail. Meanwhile, transportation related incidences demanded more response with over 250 Million per PMT than the injuries having only about 175 Million per PMT.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91810344828 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57399415262 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435344827586 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8470067393 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268572234181 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13875748284 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699508606167 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192071593134 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065869917026 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.