The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the points scored by team A, Team B, and Team C over four different seasons from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, team B has secured the highest score over four years compared to team A and B. In 2004 all three groups have gained lesser points than other years. When team A has the highest point in 2004, team B became at the lowest position in 2004.
Though the overall points have fluctuated over the period, team B has the highest point in 2002 with 82, whereas, it has gradually reduced to 60 in 2003 and thereby 43 in 2004. But a significant increase occurred in 2005 with 55 points.
In contrast, team B has the largest point of 35 in 2004, and the lowest point in 2002 of 5 points. Even they outnumbered to 11 in 2003, it again declined steadily after a significant increase in 2004 to 8 points in 2005.
Similarly, team C gained the highest score in 2003 with 15 points, followed by 12 points in 2004 and 10 in 2002. The minimum score was in 2005 with 5.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...points than other years. When team A has the highest point in 2004, team B became...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37634408602 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32636092198 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9054196562 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142240535652 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749239309102 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869988926721 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107788059143 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886132386741 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 95.5 61.2550243902 156% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.