The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates data about the scores of three different teams during four different seasons.
Overall, Team A secured high scores in all the seasons. On the other hand, Team B managed with the last position for the first two seasons, while Team C got into last position for the final two seasons.
In 2002, the number of points scored by Team A is 82. Then the points saw a significant decline to 60 in the following season. Despite falling to 43 points in the 2004 season, the figure increased to 55 in the last season. This is the leading team in all the four events.
With regards to Team B, In 2002, they closed the season with 5 points, which is half the value of Team C. Following this, the number of points improved to 11 and 35 respectively, in the next two years. Finally, In 2005, they got 8 points. In Contrast, Team C which was in second position for the initial two seasons, fell to the third position in the final two seasons with 12 and 8 points in 2004 and 2005 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'score'?
Suggestion: score
...sons. Overall, Team A secured high scores in all the seasons. On the other hand, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l the seasons. On the other hand, Team B managed with the last position for the f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, then, third, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44385026738 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38355149694 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51871657754 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1814263305 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5454545455 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174853506904 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080758672299 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921905971297 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147004142799 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106536243478 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.