The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates how many points by team over four different seasons from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, team B always stand at the first rank all four season, while team B and team C hold the second and the third position.
A glance to chart provided reveals that team B has the highest point throughout four seasons, especially in 2002. This year was the highest points of team B. However, they had a downward trend in the next two seasons since they dropped to 43 points in 2004. Then team B increased point, which was 12 points larger than that of 2004.
Nevertheless, team A had an upward trend in the point from 2002 to 2004, making them jump to second rank in 2004. In this season, team C had 35 points, compared to 12 points of team C. However team A decreased rapidly in the next seasons, while team C reach the bottom at 5 points which was same points with team C in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hold the second and the third position. A glance to chart provided reveals that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40718562874 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23442373593 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532934131737 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 178.2 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4253408071 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7777777778 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159822290479 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853086878263 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553305205485 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123804733522 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358477435399 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 95.5 61.2550243902 156% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.42 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.