The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts outline the Charlestown people of age group 20 to 69 into underweight, ideal, overweight and obese in 1995 and 2015.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is the rate of obesity in all age groups of people increased rapidly. It can be also be seen that underweight among all groups saw a significant decline. In the 60-69 age group, ideal weight inhabitants plunged over the period.
From the age group 20 to 29, the zero obese people in 1995 increased slightly to around 5% of the total population in 2015. The rates of underweight and ideal weight remained nearly the same in both the years. In the age group 30-39 in 1995 the obesity among the people is 0% and in 2015 the underweight people contribute nearly 2% which is least among all the categories. The percentage of ideal people in the age group 30 to 49 went down by nearly 20%. Similarly, the obesity rates in the same group increased by at least 15%.
The obesity rate soared nearly 4 and 6 times among 50-59 and 60-69 age group respectively. From the age group 60-69, the number of people with ideal weight reduced to below 5% in 2015. In contrast, there are nearly thrice as many as overweight inhabitants in 2015 in the same group. Both overweight and underweight percentage had been reduced by around 17% and 2% respectively in the age group 50-59.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64705882353 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55714989906 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449579831933 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.729303701 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0769230769 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0874033424454 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444121274964 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393222676736 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762161046898 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317854880242 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.