The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information.
The chart illustrates information about the number of game softwares, CDs and DVDs that were sold between 2000 and 2004.
Overall, the CD's are very popular globally during the period. In contrast, game softwares are least sold among the given items in all the years. However, the sales of game softwares followed increasing trend unlike CD's.
In the year 2000, CD sales are around 35 billion dollars, at that time DVD's sales are half the sales of CD sales. Game softwares contributed approximately 15 billion dollars in the same year. Following year, the number of CD's that were sold saw a negligible decline. In comparison the sales of both DVD and game software went up slightly. Between 2002 and 2003, DVD video selling surged reaching the values around 25 and around 30 respectively. Next, the sales of game softwares in 2002 improved a little bit from 2001, but remained almost similar in 2003. Finally, CD deals remained almost same from 2001 till the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... were sold saw a negligible decline. In comparison the sales of both DVD and game software...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...went up slightly. Between 2002 and 2003, DVD video selling surged reaching the va...
^^
Line 9, column 500, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...es of game softwares in 2002 improved a little bit from 2001, but remained almost similar ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91017964072 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46731293455 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8631252066 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204778302215 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791771825367 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531641972781 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151919998842 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226289937733 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.