The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2020 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
The given chart illustrates the number of trips made by children in a particular country in 1990 and 2010. The five modes of transport were car passenger, walking, cycling, walking with bus and bus.
Overall, the popularity of walking was the highest in 1990. Over the period of 20 years, car passenger became the most popular.
In 1990, the children went to more than 12 million trips on foot, while in 2010, the number halved to 6 million. By contrast, not many students traveled to and from school by car passenger initially, however, the number of trips using the mean of transport increased by 8 million and accounted for under 12 million in 2010.
There were more than 6 million trips per year using bikes in 1990, while only one third of that in the last year. A similar pattern could be seen in the figure for the remain types of transport. At the outset, combination of walking and bus was used for nearly 6 million trips and that of bus was about 7 million. In 2010, the number of trips using walking with bus and bus were roughly 3 million and about 5 million respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r passenger became the most popular. In 1990, the children went to more than ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 165, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...pattern could be seen in the figure for the remain types of transport. At the outset, comb...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61224489796 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41901308868 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7008816023 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263406101879 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110562317351 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093169548722 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161986351991 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916080993491 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.