Organized tours to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment?
In these days, an upward trend of travelers visiting remote locations on organized tours has aroused people’s discussion. I would concede that this tendency does come with some adverse effects, yet the benefits created by it far eclipse the disadvantages.
On the one hand, this tendency certainly exerts a detrimental implication to the environment of the destination. The fact is that an increase in tourists is synonymous with a growth of trashes and garbage. nowadays, in all likelihood, not every individual can recognize that their own activities could jeopardize the environment to some extent, therefore, when travelling, people litter rubbish indiscriminately and it could compromise visited places directly. Simultaneously, there are a number of green covers in the location replacing by tourist attractions, which could lead to the negative influence on the local people’s health.
There are, however, some dazzling advantages of remote areas frequented by travelers can easily overshadow the disadvantages of that. Providing jobs and reducing unemployment is the first benefit of the trend. The in flux of tourists visit in tandem with the need of human resources in terms of service sector climbs. Thus, local dwellers could have stable income and enhance the quality of their lives. The second plus point of the type of tour is that it help the locals have an opportunity to broaden their knowledge by understanding more cultures in the world. For instance, to ethnic people in remote places, who are almost isolated from the outside world, through interacting with tourists, they could comprehend more about civilized society and gain experiences.
In conclusion, although the development of tourism in remote places could threaten its environment, this growth still brings several positive effects on the local such as declining the proportion of jobless or improving the inhabitants’ knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
...s with a growth of trashes and garbage. nowadays, in all likelihood, not every individua...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Providing jobs and reducing unemployment is the first benefit of the trend. The i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59322033898 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13190621527 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1239698287 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.923076923 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228737835684 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626001181196 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471952945661 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119253032389 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00668110045679 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.