Nowadays many animals species are on the verge of extinction due to humans’ activities on land and in sea. Why? Solution?
In recent years, it is believed that there is an increase in species put on the brink of extinction and human is a key factor having a bearing on their existence. There are a variety of rational explanations for this notion in tandem with some measures to cope with this problem.
To begin with, there are two culprits why humans’ activities could be blamed for putting some animals on the verge of extinction. Firstly, toxic sewage is discharged directly from manufacturing plants into the sea, so water contamination is inevitable. This harsh reality leads to the unfortunate disappearance of many schools of fish. For example, Formosa – a steel producing company – released liquid waste into the sea in the center of Vietnam in the past, leading to massive deaths of fish. Secondly, an array of animals are being poached due to an increased demand for products made from their body parts. A rhino is a case in a point. Since their horns could be sold at high prices, they are one of key targets of illegal hunters. Therefore, the quantity of this wild animal has been reducing significantly.
In fact, there are several measures to increase animal preservation. With marine ecosystem, governments should allocate funding for upgrading waste treatment systems, thus, sewage would be cleaned before dumping into rivers or sea. For endangered animals with the loss of bodys’ parts, there should be restrictions or prohibitions of utilizing products made from animal skin or horns. Another viable solution is heavy fines or even imprisoning poachers. Truly, current governments’ attempts to deter illegal hunting are insufficient due to light penalties, therefore, more fitting punishments for those living outside the law are crucial.
In conclusion, the danger of wildlife on land or in sea stems from irresponsible activities of people such as discharging untreated waste and illegal poaching. However, there are some ways to mitigate adverse effects are enhancing treatment systems, limiting or banning the use of bodys’ parts of animals and administering severe punishments on illegal people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33827893175 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97100369646 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605341246291 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2067527866 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.823529412 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239092850679 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625785438381 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564037861261 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124462232232 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035015844617 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.