The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of incidents and wounds per 100 million passenger miles commuted by commuter rail, heavy rail, light rail, bus and demand response in 2002. The units are measured in PMT.
Overall, both incidents and injuries experienced an upward trend in 2002. The number of incidents are more than the injuries for all the types of transportation.
On the one hand, the incidents are accounted for around 30 PMT in commuter rail and it is higher than injuries only by 2 PMT. Injuries had 28 PMT in commuter rail. The heavy rail accounted 50 PMT for the incidents and around 40 PMT for the injuries and in the Light rail also incidents are more and it accounted for around 75 PMT where injuries is below the 50 PMT.
On the other hand, in bus also incidents are more than injuries and it is accounted for 70 and 60 PMT respectively. In the demand response like car and two-wheelers, both incidents and injuries are highest compared to all transportation and the incidents are more than 250 PMT where wounds are around 165 PMT.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more and it accounted for around 75 PMT where injuries is below the 50 PMT. ...
^^
Line 13, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elow the 50 PMT. On the other hand, in bus also incidents are more than inju...
^^
Line 13, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and injuries are highest compared to all transportation and the incidents are mor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72043010753 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65554392093 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41935483871 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9974700953 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342016960415 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1539012337 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044498480512 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216031489217 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283099262644 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.