The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 Europe countries from 2000 to 2012.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of female members of parliament in five Europe countries between 2000 and 2012.
In general, all the nations had the number of women in council rose up throughout a period of 12 years with different growing rates.
In 2000, Germany had the highest percentage of female members of parliament at about 33%. Ranking second and third were Italy and France with nearly 26% and 25%. These figure then gradually went up to almost 36%, 40% and 33% in 2012, respectively.
The data of Belgium and UK were far lower than three above countries with about 17% to Belgium and only 3% to UK in 2000. Over the period of 12 years, the percentage of female members of council in Belgium fluctuated and slightly went up to 23% in 2012. In the meantime, UK witnessed a dramatic increased from about 3% to exactly the same number of Belgium of almost 23%. The percentage gap between 2 countries were shorter then almost disappeared in 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 417, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shorter than'?
Suggestion: shorter than
...percentage gap between 2 countries were shorter then almost disappeared in 2012.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76331360947 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54282324824 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8835300829 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301851271899 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129466533887 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128003890988 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191422035128 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138950902453 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.