The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates the using of various means of transport to travel to and from work in one Europe city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, transports took more human energy such as foot and bike were used more in the past then they were gradually replaced by automatic vehicles over period of years. Bus was relatively steady chosen by users while the figures of car, bike and foot were more strongly fluctuated by years.
Bus was pretty familiar to travelers with about 18% of them used it in 1960, this number significantly rose up to over 25% in 1980 then suddenly fell back to almost 15% in 2000. Car was rarely known in 1960 with only about 5% travelers drove it to and from work, however this figure impressively increased to almost 23% in 1980 then continued to grow and reach the peak of approximately 35% in 2000, this ratio made car the most popular vehicle in surveyed city.
Bike was chosen by a certain part of travelers with 25% in 1960, this percentage slightly decreased to 20% in 1980 then sharply fell down to about 5% in 2000. Foot had the similar trend to bike with nearly 35% of travelers walked to and from work in 1960, this number dramatically declined to over 15% in 1980 and only lower than 10% in 2000. The appearance and popularization of automatic and convenient vehicles as car and bus had gradually replaced the position of traditional modes of transport as bike and foot in transportation market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | Sai sushma | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | Sukeerty | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | binita karki | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-09 | Minh Pham | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | faruke | 78 | view |
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- Marriages in America 73
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries in 2009 and 2010 46
- Consumer spending on different items in five countries 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65234375 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55834922496 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4231555907 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.875 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20633964001 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114799911881 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11349510515 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174416949212 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137404676694 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.