The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the four different means of transportation by which people of one European city traveled to and from their workplace in the year 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, while more and more people chose a car as their main conveyance, the percentage of travelers who used bus, bike and foot was decreased correspondingly by the end of the period.
Looking at the details, in 1960, the lowest proportion of only 5% of the total travelers commuted to their destination by car. This figure then increased dramatically over the next 40 years and stood at around 35 % of total commuters by 2000. Although a similar pattern can be observed in case of travelling by bus, particularly from 1960 to 1980, when around 7 % more people traveled by this means ( from 18% to 25% ), by the year 2000, this figure dropped to around 16%.
As we can see further, though foot and bike were the most popular means of transportation in the start of the period, with approximately 34% and 25% of total travelers respectively, the proportion of passengers fell significantly in the final year and reached at around 9% and 6% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 7 % more people traveled by this means from 18% to 25% , by the year 2000, this...
^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... traveled by this means from 18% to 25% , by the year 2000, this figure dropped t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86082474227 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97031097713 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3998252389 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.166666667 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199797432707 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109797438594 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113246357113 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140986162117 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125369354039 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.