The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2001 Summarize information by selecting and reporitng the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2001.
Summarize information by selecting and reporitng the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the quantity of homes in owned and rented lodging from 1918 to 2011 in England and Wales. Overall, as can be seen, during given period of time the percentage of rented accommodation always declined , except 1953 and 2011, whereas the opposite situantion can be observed with the number of owned homes.
First of all, after having looked at the bar chart, it should be mentioned that in 1918 the percentage of rented households reached a maximum (approximately 78%), while in the same year the quantity of owned lodging was minor (rougly 23%). In addition, until 2001 there was a significant increase in the number of owned homes, also 2001 saw the major pick of owner-owned houses (about 68%). But this dramatic growth was followed by a slight decrease and to 2011 the mark approximately accounted for 64%.
Absolutely reverse situatian could be monitred with the percentage of rental accommodation and in 1971 the percentages of both types of lodging represented totally identical numbers (exactly 50 percent).

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
.... Overall, as can be seen, during given period of time the percentage of rented accommodation ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of rented accommodation always declined , except 1953 and 2011, whereas the oppos...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, whereas, while, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01694915254 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73737936762 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64406779661 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.7005074131 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189869150839 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894857460345 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048827567694 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120389169516 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03624653267 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.