The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The bar graph illustrates about the proportion of households which were owned and rented housings in England and Wales from 1918 till 2011.
To begin with, by analysing first year of housing (1918), it is clear that, the proportion of rented households (87%) was much higher in comparison to owned (22%). Furthermore, rented accommodation once more higher in proportion (68%) than owned (31%) during 1939. Apart from that, in next two years, the proportion of renting was more in count (68% and 58%) as compared to owning households (32% and 41%) respectively.
On contrast, during mid year (1971), the proportion of both criteria became same (50%). However, in 1981, the count of owned households became increase significantly (60%) and opposite criteria became lower (40%). Whereas, in further years, from 1991 to 2011, the value of owned households increased slightly. However, renting households became down in proportion.
Overall, only during 1971, the proportion of both criteria became constant. However, in other years, their value became change in renting and owing households which were consider in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
... Furthermore, rented accommodation once more higher in proportion 68% than owned 31% during...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...renting and owing households which were consider in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2320441989 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67878897662 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6029760587 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189074314229 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881671595687 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599675850772 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136986388753 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391623716052 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.