Some people think it is one of the best ways to solve environmental problems by increasing the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, environmental issues become hot potatoes. Therefore, according to few of individuals ,by increasing the value of natural resources such as fuel for automobiles. Thus, this issue is overcome. I completely disagree with the statement and reasons are discussed in the paragraphs below.
To begin with, in contemporary settings, every individual have their own automobiles therefore this leads to environmental causes and exploitation of natural resources to. Hence, by increasing the cost of fuels this issue is not overcame extremely. However, there are plethora of another ways to overcome this issue. The first and foremost way is legal authorities should pass odd-even system. In this criteria, authorities pass this system, thus on one day only even number cars are allowed on roads and controversy, on another day odd number cars are driven. Due to this manner, environment causes is gone to be declined because there are less number of vehicles which are on roads and this also overcome the issue of traffic problems which is also major sequence of this issue. Because, in traffic jams, engines of vehicles are gone to be start which releases harmful gases in atmosphere and individuals also blow horns continuous which leads to noise pollution.
Furthermore, the another factor is use of eco friendly fuels which are used in automobiles such as CNG. In this criteria, legal authorities provide public transport in every state which is driven on CNG fuel which is eco friendly and does not release any harmful fumes. As a result, this may overcome global environment issue and decline the exploitation of resources. In addition, if authorities provide the service of public transportation in rural as well as urban areas then this also plays major role to solve this issue. Because, in rural areas, masses cover long distance to reach their destination. Thus, their use private vehicles which leads to release of gases and maximize the rate of global warming.
To recapitulate, I personally consider that, although by increasing wages of fuels solve the issue of environment. However, there are plenty of another measures to overcome this cause such as utilisation of CNG based automobiles, public transport and so on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...come hot potatoes. Therefore, according to few of individuals ,by increasing the v...
^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...erefore, according to few of individuals ,by increasing the value of natural resou...
^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'overcome'.
Suggestion: overcome
...ing the cost of fuels this issue is not overcame extremely. However, there are plethora ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...orities should pass odd-even system. In this criteria, authorities pass this system,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...are used in automobiles such as CNG. In this criteria, legal authorities provide pub...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25698324022 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8682513102 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508379888268 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9491793666 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0526315789 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117402402541 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421766447146 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411725380583 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822686949148 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257953340476 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.