Most people these days prefer getting news online to reading newspapers or watching TV. Do you think it is a positive development?
Newspaper and television are the authentic source of information in few last decades however, nowadays due to increase in technology more masses prefer online news despite the newspaper or tv. Individuals getting news have more negative impact rather than positive. I would discuss both pros and cons in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are plethora of negative effect of getting online news. The major point is newspaper is helpful for learning typical languages because the all writers are masters in their language. Whereas, it gives more content and information despite the online news because online news has less content. Moreover, to get some online information on mobile phones this get affects on their eye sight. If older masses watch online news in more the they face many problems such as back pain and lower in eyesight to.
On the flip side, there are some positive impacts to getting online news. Online news are spread quickly on social media. It is beneficial for individuals because the newspaper or tv take time to get news however online news are quickly viewer. Furthermore, more individuals prefer online news on mobile phones. It is good for our environment because masses are less used newspaper which is made by wood. For instance, in Australia, during 2002, survey conducted towards trees. That survey showed 30% of trees were deforested for newspaper. Therefore, this positive development of getting online news to save environment.
To conclude, although there are some negative developments of getting online news and their effect on eyesight, yet there are also positive development such as online news spread quickly and in this manner do not need to cut the trees for paper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...mobile phones this get affects on their eye sight. If older masses watch online news in m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
... older masses watch online news in more the they face many problems such as back pain an...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16785714286 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58498164443 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532142857143 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0120386313 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1176470588 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329544338738 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118845758252 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829624036792 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221380997396 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374443014762 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.