The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed I m four different months in 2014 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time

Essay topics:

The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed I'm four different months in 2014 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type, that were borrowed over this time.

The given line graph depicts that how many books were borrowed in four different months during 2014 from four village libraries. Whereas, the pie chart illustrates the type and percentage of books that were borrowed in this time.
After analysing, it is clear that, the maximum books were borrowed by Ryeslip and Sutton Wood village in 2014 and the church mount was borrowed less books.
To begin with, the line graph, the west eaton village was borrowed 50 books in June and this figure was increased upto 150 books in august, after that this became stable for one month. In addition ryeslip village was borrowed maximum (300) books in June however this decreased to 125 in september. Moreover, sutton wood borrowed 250 books in june and this increased with 25 number in July. And in august, that was fell only upto 100 books however after a month this climbed with 300 books. And laston village and church mount, that was borrowed 50 books in june and was increased with 150 books in september.
Moving further towards pie chart, fiction books were borrowed more rather than other books that was 43%. And 19% books of biography which were borrowed. Furthermore, science and historical books were borrowed with similar proportion (14%) and the self help books were borrowed only with 10% respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun books is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... 2014 and the church mount was borrowed less books. To begin with, the line graph,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...at this became stable for one month. In addition ryeslip village was borrowed maximum 30...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, whereas, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91818181818 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24760662421 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0138107345 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3636363636 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49254934332 0.215688989381 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236814383961 0.103423049105 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117193976851 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364007724319 0.15604864568 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176447069589 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.