The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billion ) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 to 2002.
The given bar graph illustrates about the telephone calls in UK and that classified in three different categories between 1995 till 2002.
After analysing, it is clear that, the maximum call transfer is in 1999 and minimum is in 1995. There are three categories including local fix line, national and international fixed call and mobile (all calls). The data is calibrated in billion minutes.
To begin with, the local calls in 1995. The local calls transferred 73 minutes and it increased from 1995 to 1999 and that value was 88 minutes which call transferred by locals. After 1999, it decreased upto 2002 and the last value was 70 minutes. Moreover, national and international calls were 36 minutes in 1995. It inclined between 1995 to 2002 and after 2001, that was stable on 55 minutes by followed next year to.
Furthermore, 3 billion minutes call in 1995 and this was incline with 20 minutes in 2002. In 2001, this increased with 15 minutes and after that year, this was also incline with 7 minutes (42) and that was the maximum value of all calls of mobile.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...le all calls. The data is calibrated in billion minutes. To begin with, the local cal...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inclined'.
Suggestion: inclined
...utes and after that year, this was also incline with 7 minutes 42 and that was the maxi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74594594595 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49953100057 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502702702703 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8521728617 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8181818182 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302955985426 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133060306007 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717019976604 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20138195112 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483188074232 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.