Some people think that the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects to make progress. Do u agree or disagree ?
In modern era, there are lot of scientific research that shocks a normal human. Some individuals think that the authority should give more financial help in teaching science despite of other subjects. This notion have both pros and cons. I shed some light on both the views in forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are numerous reasons to government should invest money to teach science. Because, technology is increasing day by day and science is the major part of technology. There are various scientists and their researches which are famous in the world such as Einstein, he was scientist and he researched on light. Therefore, if upcoming generation learn about the science then they also become upcoming scientists in the world. Government must financially help in teaching science.
On the flip side, there are plethora of side effects of this notion. If authority invest more money in teaching science than the students give more focus on science only rather than other subjects as well as, this also shows impact on ecological development. Whereas, students need to learn all subjects equally rather than prefer more on one subject. For example, if government invest money in teaching science then the authority also have to invest to on other subjects such as maths, because it is also individual's use in their daily life.
To sum up, although, government invest money only in teaching science owing to this students gain knowledge regarding science projects, yet law maker should invest money in teaching all subjects. Because if people know about well in all subjects then they also develop literacy rate of their country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... despite of other subjects. This notion have both pros and cons. I shed some light o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...shows impact on ecological development. Whereas, students need to learn all subjects eq...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... invest money in teaching all subjects. Because if people know about well in all subjec...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, for example, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14179104478 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56714248516 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.854432302 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387428835613 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116975689201 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112438000028 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225467294232 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070663279806 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.