Most people these days prefer getting news online to reading newspapers or watching TV. Do you think it is a positive development?
Today many men and women are having a preference for reading news on the internet instead of traditional newspapers and television. This essay will argue that this is a positive development because it alleviates paper consumption and facilitates fast and convenient news for people.
Going online to read news will reduce the amount of paper used. This is mainly because newspapers are manufactured by this type of material, yet documents for broadcasting news on TV. Therefore, the transition of reading news to online platforms will result in the demand of newspapers declining, hence the total amount of paper consumed every day will be considerably decreased. For example, Australia recently reported that every year 30% of total trees are cut down for producing newspapers and paper-related products.
Online newspapers can trigger the emergence of quick and easy news for people. The primary reason for many people choosing news on the internet to read is that those news are shorter and clearer in order to be kept informed rapidly. Taking my personal experience as an example, I follow news on the internet because I don’t want to miss any latest political statement from the government. So because of this predicament, traditional news on newspapers and TV will be forced to adapt, creating shorter and more clarity news to drive more people into those platforms, putting a kibosh on long and exaggerated news and headlines in society.
In conclusion, reading news through smartphones and computers is conducive to future development because it minimises the amount of paper consumption and fosters the transparency of news for people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'those newses'?
Suggestion: this news; those newses
...ng news on the internet to read is that those news are shorter and clearer in order to be ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30418250951 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92584995441 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528517110266 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5611486427 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.818181818 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247911462911 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109166904446 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415121618934 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159790643937 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232186039078 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.