The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Men and women are making direct interaction among people obsolete by using social media sites more often. This essay will argue that although those platforms offer a broad connection, I believe that this can not outweigh the drawback of diminishing communication skills
Having access to social networks helps users keep in contact with various relationships. It is indeed that within a smartphone or tablet, people can exchange interactions through online phone calls, or messages despite being distantly segregated. That is to say that instead of arranging traditional meetings just to strengthen relationships, people can sit comfortably at home or workplaces and still form a broad range of society around themselves. For example, I still have a good relationship with my middle school friend through Facebook despite having to schedule a meeting as they moved to a foreign country 10 years ago. However, online interaction can result in an emotionless society because it diminishes the opportunity to interact verbally between people.
Having traditional conversations is an effective way to strengthen communication skills. In other words, communicating in both verbal and non-verbal language can expose people to be more confident and various experiences that can help men and women deal with many circumstances, such as job interviews or even formal conversation with strangers. Whereas people who spend more time on social media can result in being isolated in life, because of the lack of opportunity to communicate, leads to the fear of talking and even showing the most trivial facial expression. For example, Ireland has banned residents from using Facebook or Twitter for a certain time a day to encourage people to go outside and communicate traditionally. This opportunity means that face-to-face conversations are very worthwhile as it helps with individual skills development.
In conclusion, the benefit of easily connecting and developing relationships while using social networks can not outweigh the chance to enhance communication skills, while being in the same physical place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 78
- Countries should produce the food that their population eats and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
- There have been many inventions in human history such as the wheel Some people think the most important thing is the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people think that work is the most important thing of people s life Without a successful career life become meaningless To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 835, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
... worthwhile as it helps with individual skills development. In conclusion, the bene...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58255451713 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14239587538 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607476635514 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0908550401 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190092711451 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714505475036 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592959542229 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113980750935 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326731949173 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.