Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Some would argue that being a host for an international sporting competition is conducive to the development of the country, while others believe that it is not good. Although an international event will exploit a large amount of money from the nation, the chance to be more well-known is much more preferable.
One the one hand, holding an event for worldwide sportsmen needs the government to invest in sports facilities. That is to say that the increasing intensity of sports demands not only the quality of stadiums and training facilities but the capability of athletes in order to compete at an international level. Hence, it is vital that states have to make uncountable investments, which will cost billions of money from taxpayers, for the betterence of those facilities and domestic competitors so they can achieve success and make the nation proud. For example, the Vietnam government estimates 20 billion dollars have to be spent for organising SEA Games 23, a regional sport event. However, those investments merit to be made because it is good for the long term achievement, and that the country will have more excellent sportpersons entitled to compete worldwide
On the other hand, being a host can draw a global level of attraction to the country. To be more specific, the host country will be a destination for a number of competitors regardless of nationalities, yet spectators, viewers across countries and the global media. This once of a lifetime opportunity not only creates various financial benefits for the country, partly resulting in the rising amount of money from travelers, but also produces huge attraction from foreigners through social media, TV broadcasts, or news. For example, a survey found that the SEA Game held in 2003 brought about a 76% increase in the number of people travelling to or knowing about Vietnam, which had never been seen before. I believe this school of thought is preferable because it benefits both socially and economically.
In conclusion, although establishing a worldwide sport event cost a considerable amount of money, it is good for long term objects and creates numerous attraction opportunities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19943019943 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0000311143 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541310541311 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1543515815 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.083333333 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220537348648 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834461234677 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607812919366 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136484432464 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485471861296 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.