Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
People hold conflicting views about whether it is good or bad to host an international sports event. While many people believe that it is a bad idea to organize a large sports event, I would argue that hosting this kind of event brings many benefits to the nation.
On the one hand, proponents of the idea that host countries have to deal with several problems tend to point out a combination of reasons. First and foremost, it will cost lots of money to hold an event like that. This is because the host country must prepare for all things including upgrading facilities by itself, which takes it a large amount of expense. Another compelling reason is that hosting an international sports game can rise crime rates in the nation. During the game, bad people have more chances to steal things or even terrorize in crowded places. It will create a bad impression about the country from visitors.
On the other hand, I advocate for those who believe that international sports games can provide some advantages for the host country. The primary rationale is that it will help the country to widen its relationship with other countries. For example, Vietnam improved its relationship harmoniously so well with neighboring Asian nations such as Singapore and Thailand in Sea Games 2003. Furthermore, becoming the host of this event can help the country to boost its tourism. It can be explained by the fact that, if the sports event is organized in a country, many people from many nations in the world will come there to see the event. As a result, this region will be a destination for foreign tourists and they can visit other interesting places besides the event location, which makes this country more well-known.
In conclusion, both sides are justifiable. However, on balance, I believe that hosting a large sports event is very beneficial for the country because of the significant advantages of boosting tourism and relationships with other countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...at it is a bad idea to organize a large sports event, I would argue that hosting this ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...n be explained by the fact that, if the sports event is organized in a country, many p...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...balance, I believe that hosting a large sports event is very beneficial for the countr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94545454545 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71357502934 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521212121212 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4571475137 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310055042933 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106121746572 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822666160174 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205980358083 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771759928068 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.