It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening
Do you agree or disagree?
Some would argue that the extinction of animals is inevitable and hence the intervention of humans is unnecessary. This essay completely disagrees with that statement because the unbalanced ecosystem will affect the environment and it is more preferable to conserve as many species as possible for future generations.
The disappearance of some species will disturb the ecosystem and in turn create environmental problems. If an animal disappears entirely, it will trigger the loss of other species on the food chain and lead to animals hunting or finding habitable places unnaturally. Consequently, agricultural land, air and water quality will be diminished as those interactions make up and maintain the environments we know today. For example, the wildfire rate in Australia is the highest in the world due to the paucity of species helping trees grow, leading to plants becoming drier and more combustible.
Preserving the planet's biodiversity is what ancestors should do for future development. It is unfair for our descendants to not be able to see or interact with animals that used to be present on Earth. Yet the opportunity to learn and discover nature from those species, which can not be possessed or thought about at present time. For example, imagine how less appealing the wildlife will be 20 years later, as WWF predicts that 20% of all creatures will disappear completely by 2040. However, it should be noted that preserving animal life can cost a large amount of money and effort that authorities may not be willing to spend.
In conclusion, people should help put the kibosh on animal extinction because animals nourish the environment for the well-being of humans and that the bioversity is what our future life deserves to have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...and more combustible. Preserving the planets biodiversity is what ancestors should d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20422535211 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94741656908 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.84767155 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192644142227 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701944181235 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406809931282 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122323667503 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235680959345 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.