The chart below shows the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

The pie chart illustrates about the proportion of three types of nutrients which are consumed by USA individuals in their typical meal which become unhealthy if they eat in large quantity.
To begin with, it is clear by analysing the pie chart of sodium and saturated fat that, the proportion of consumption of both the nutrients has more consumed in dinner meat is about 43% and 37%. Furthermore, in lunch, the quantity of sodium (29%) and saturated fat (26%) is almost similar with little difference of 3%. However, the proportion of sodium in snacks and breakfast is same, about 14%, while the quantity of saturated fat contains in breakfast is 21% and in snacks is 16% respectively.
In addition, the another pie chart shows the proportion of added sugar and it is clear from that, large quantity of this is consumed through snacks (42%). Moreover, in lunch and breakfast, it's quantity is little less with the difference of 3% to. The left proportion is consumed in dinner, that is 23% respectively.
Overall, the proportion of all three types of nutrients are consumed in the meals of dinner and less number of quantity is taken in breakfast by the people of USA.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80099502488 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74040400553 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47263681592 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5315977194 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152528236707 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713842651351 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973680718429 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130815251014 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104755588465 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.