The bar chart below show the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007.
The given bar graph depicts the information about how much in a week that youngsters spent doing various activities in Chester between 2002 and 2007.
From an overall prospective, is is clear that, the most of the teenagers were watched television from 2002 to 2007. The dafa is calibrated in hours. The source of information is English in Chester.
To begin with, the how much time youngsters were going to pubs. In 2002, teenagers spent 8 hours per week in pubs. It increased in 2003 (10 hours) and from 2004 to 2006, that was constant on 12 hours. After 2006, it increased rapidly on 18 hours. Moreover, 25 hours per, youngsters were watched television in 2002 and 2003. This inclined during 2007, and the value was became 38 hours per week. Nevertheless, masses spent 7 hours on shoping in 2002 amd this was increased in 2003 and became stable after one year. After 2004, this inclined 5% in 2007.
Furthermore, people spent 12 hours in doing household works in 2002. It decreased 2 hours in 2003 and constant in 2004. This was declined 3 hours in 2007. Nevertheless, in 2002, more masses played sports ( 10 hours). It declined with 7 hours during next 6 years. Whereas, 11 hours spent individuals on watching DVDs in 2002. This was incline in 2004 (17hours). After 2004, this declined 7 hours in 2007. Lastly, only four, people did blowing in 2002. After some fluctuations, it decreased on one hour per week in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...nd 2007. From an overall prospective, is is clear that, the most of the teenagers w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...is English in Chester. To begin with, the how much time youngsters were going to pubs...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...inclined during 2007, and the value was became 38 hours per week. Nevertheless, masses...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...less, in 2002, more masses played sports 10 hours. It declined with 7 hours durin...
^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lined with 7 hours during next 6 years. Whereas, 11 hours spent individuals on watching...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 431, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'blow'
Suggestion: blow
... in 2007. Lastly, only four, people did blowing in 2002. After some fluctuations, it de...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69477911647 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54201322986 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477911646586 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 8.94146341463 246% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4817845429 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 53.1363636364 112.824112599 47% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.3181818182 22.9334400587 49% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.09268292683 391% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325509285519 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103643395995 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084950350393 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22045671406 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265877868684 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 13.2329268293 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 94.15 61.2550243902 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.9 10.3012195122 28% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.74 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.27 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.