The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007
Overall, while teenagers allocated more and more time to go to pubs or discos, watch television and go shopping, the amount of time spent on other pursuits experienced an overall downward trend, except watching DVDS, which fluctuated. During this period, recreation activities are the most favoured among adolescents and doing homework or doing sport and bowling are less popular.
Going to pubs or discos took teenagers about 6 hours in 2002 and increased significantly to above 16 hours in 2007. The amount of time spent watching television rose from 25 hours at the beginning of the period to approximately 37 hours in the final year. Similarly, the figure for time spent on shopping soared from around 7 hours in 2002 to 15 hours five years later.
In 2002, doing homework took teenagers about 13 hours, prior to a decline to 7 hours in 2007. Throughout the given period, the amount of time spent on doing sport and bowling observed a substantial fall from 10 hours to about 3 hours and from 4 hours to around 1 hour respectively. Young adolescents dedicated slightly above 10 hours watching DVDs in 2002, this reached a peak of 17 hours in 2004 before falling to 10 hours at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
Peoples opinions differ as to whether or not school children should be given homewor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... academic achievements, and this country regularly tops international educational...
^^
Line 5, column 915, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...teachers at schools, they need to apply these knowledge to doing their homeworks in order to le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 5.60731707317 606% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 965.302439024 189% => OK
No of words: 334.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47005988024 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92305283421 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 106.607317073 187% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595808383234 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 283.868780488 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2416172029 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0315934294821 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0122606321255 0.103423049105 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.018202086253 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0155879126664 0.15604864568 10% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180856297529 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 40.7170731707 231% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.