The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007
The average time figure for different activities of teenagers in Chester in the period of 5 years beginning in 2002 is depicted in the bar chart. There are seven categories in total which are going to pubs/discos, watching TV, shopping, doing homework, doing sport, watching DVDs and bowling.
From tge prospective outlook, watching television has been the most prevalent among teenagers. Apart from that, the amount of time spent on pubs/discos, watiching TV and shopping witnessed an upward trend, while a conflicting movement was recorded in the remaining activities.
From a quich glance to the statistics of going to pubs, watching TV and shopping, from 2002 to 2004, the weekly time figure for pubs climbed minimally by nearly 10 hours, while that of watching television was approximately 2 times more significant. Initially, the data of time for watching TV stabilized at 25 hours, then surged by 5 hours in 2004, however, that of shopping rose by 5 hours at first, then remained unchanged until 2004. Between 2005 and 2007, there was a substantially increase to a peak in three mentioned categories.
Moving on to analyse the remaining part of the chart, in the fisrt three years depicted, the amount of time spent on doing homework, sport and bowling decreased slightly, contradictorily, teenagers spent more time on watching DVDs which led to a peak in 2004 at nearly 25 hours. Finally, all four entities recorded a remarkable drop to the lowest point in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('substantially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... 2004. Between 2005 and 2007, there was a substantially increase to a peak in three mentioned categories...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, then, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0658436214 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89144365481 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5522087486 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.777777778 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17944644984 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757802431788 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651372998944 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111810378069 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624062805821 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.