The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The given chart gives information regarding the proportion of the households in rented and owned accommodation in England and Wales from 1981 to 2011.
We can see that the percentage of household living in owned accommodation rose steadily from just over 20% in 1918 to a peak of roughly 70% by 2001. The output then fell gradually, declining to around 62% mark in 2011. However, looking at the household in rented accommodation per cent, we see that this year’s pattern is a largely reversed: the highest number of rented housing (about 80%) was utilized in 1918, followed by a marked decline to just over 30% in 1991 and 2001. The number of household in rent accommodation then rose slightly, rising to approximately 37% in 2011. in 1971, households in rented accommodation were equal in used with owned accommodation of 50 %.
To sum up, the number of household living in owned accommodation increased in both England and Walse, while the number of hosehold in rent accommodation decresed at the end of 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar's pattern is a largely reversed: the highest number of rented housing abo...
^^
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n rose slightly, rising to approximately 37% in 2011. in 1971, households in rent...
^^^^
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...rising to approximately 37% in 2011. in 1971, households in rented accommodatio...
^^
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... used with owned accommodation of 50 %. To sum up, the number of household livin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, then, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95321637427 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02018515795 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538011695906 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2325062438 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431003426252 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212049841512 0.103423049105 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102103610331 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319692406861 0.15604864568 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634473357951 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.