The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales bewteen 1918 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
(IELTS ACADEMIC 13 - Test 2)
The chart illustrates an analysis of household owning and renting accommodation between 1918 to 2011.
They were both percentage of households in 1971. By the way, renting houses were much higher than those of owning before 1971. In 1918, rented accommodation was the highest among other years which was more 70%. However, it started to decrease from 1918 to 2001. It fell down by almost 30% in 2001. The rate of renting was risen in 2011.
On the other hand, owning accommodation was the least percentage in 1918. It was almost 20%, which had a big gap of renting, almost more than 50% in 1918. While it grew up substantially until 2001. After 1971, households in owned accommodation was much higher than rented accommodation. In 1981, owning got more 20% than renting. In 1991 and 2001, owned houses are almost similar to rented, which was in 1939 and 1953. But they had big gap in 2011, which households in rented was 35%, own that was nearly 65.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school than secondary school. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Write about the following topic:The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 73
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average of number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... renting, almost more than 50% in 1918. While it grew up substantially until 2001. Af...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7245508982 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56244050278 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538922155689 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1147286777 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.3571428571 112.824112599 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.9285714286 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190787259724 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835214982866 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710166861027 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183281046454 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626070730729 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.