The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetabkes per day in the IKfrom 2001 and 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of women , men and children consuming five serving of fruits and vegetables each day in 8 years from 2001 to 2008.
It is clear from the chart that, the percentage of women who ate fruit and vegetable started at just over 20% in 2001 which showed a constant increase and in 2006 it reached to its peak of almost 35% before falling slightly to 30% in the last year.
In terms of men and children eating fruit and vegetables the rate remained relatively stable in all the first three years about 17% and 12% respectively. From this point, the percentage of men climbed gradually to peak at about 27% in both 2006 and 2007, after it dropped to about 26%. A similar growth in the figure for children was evident reaching 25% in 2007 and around 24% in the last year.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage of all people consuming fruits and vegetables was women, while, children consistently accounted for the lowest percentage. Furthermore, a significant increase in the proportion of people was eating these food items seen in the given time period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hart illustrates the percentage of women , men and children consuming five serving...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to its peak of almost 35% before falling slightly to 30% in the last year. In ...
^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n terms of men and children eating fruit and vegetables the rate remained relativ...
^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vegetables the rate remained relatively stable in all the first three years abou...
^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en consistently accounted for the lowest percentage. Furthermore, a significant i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75129533679 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59184053685 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575129533679 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0941067991 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205667576372 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910118401565 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906493561633 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142472175251 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886359287756 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.