The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The table shows the value of fish that imported to the US (measured in billion of dollars) in 1988, 1992 and 2000. While the three pie charts illustrate the amount of fish that the US brought in from China, Canada and other countries in the same three years.
Regarding the table charts, the values of imports started at $6.57 billion in the first year, increasing to $8.52 in the 1992 and reaching $10.72 in the last year.
The pie chart, 60% of the source of fish imported to the America by the Canada in 1988 compared to China and other countries which provided only 13% and 27% respectively. In contrast, by 1992 other countries had the position of Canada as a main supplier with 46% of all imports and 42% by 2000. While, in the 1992 other countries imported the fish to the US as 20% and it increased by 10% in the ast year. Whereas, the imports from Canada then proceeded to fall to 28% in the 2000.
Overall , the value of imports rose by just under double by the given time period. At the start of the period, the US imported fish predominately from Canada but by 1992 other countries became the main source.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ish that imported to the US measured in billion of dollars in 1988, 1992 and 2000. Whil...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd it increased by 10% in the ast year. Whereas, the imports from Canada then proceeded...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d to fall to 28% in the 2000. Overall , the value of imports rose by just under...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, regarding, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42718446602 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28517224347 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47572815534 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8886823619 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307469957346 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14500252613 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849204397866 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196782170784 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882531046598 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.