The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
A glance at pie charts and table provided reveals the rate of importing fish from three different countries to the US as well as total billion dollars spent in years of 1988, 1992, and 2000.
Overall, the US spent 6.57 billion dollars for importing fish from various sources which Canada was the largest supplier at 60%. Besides, other and China had the highest export to the US at 27% and 13%, respectively. It seems that other countries section could win the race From Canada in 1992 at 46% as Canada export decreased dramatically, by 26%. Also, China marginally increased the rate of export to 20% in this year. The US decided to increase importing fish value to 8.52 billion dollars at the same year. Finally, in 2000 there was a significant growth in importing fish from China by 10% as its rate reached to 30%. Additionally, both Canada and other experienced a diminish in exporting of fish by 4%. Apparently, the US raised the fish importing value to 10.72 billion dollars.
The figures show that in the past Canada was the biggest exporter to the US and as time passed China could be replaced into the first position. The rate of Other countries export vary in three years and there are marginally changes when the competition was between other two exporters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... the US as well as total value spent in billion dollars in years of 1988, 1992, and 200...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ally, both Canada and other experienced a diminish in exporting of fish by 4%. Apparently,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...porting value to 10.72 billion dollars. The figures show that in the past Canada...
^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tition was between other two exporters.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, finally, first, if, so, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75784753363 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52272344979 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511210762332 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.507669295 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4545454545 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251251839605 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103482689917 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103582995482 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193871765959 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127851460593 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.