Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any f

Essay topics:

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.

In today’s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your argument with examples and relevant evidence.

Undoubtedly , in this world finding a proper job has become one of the most challenges that humans have during their lives. However, some people conceive that those with practical skills are far much successful than ones with theoretical knowledge. In contrast, other believe that the academic education plays a significant role in acquiring a job. In this essay, I am going to discuss more about this issue as follows.

Decidedly, some occupations like a plumber or a hairdresser need having more experience in order to be a qualified person. In other words, for instance when we get some troubles with the pipes at home, therefore, we are looking for a professional guys who is high-profile. In this occasion, it seems that a skill is far more valuable than just an academic certificate. Unfortunately, the graduates do not obtain experience at universities and just have tried to lift their resume, theoretically. The academic centers have not prepared a proper platform to train the students to become absorbed in the job market.

Necessarily, academic certificate as well as strong theoretical knowledge can come in handy while you should manage a big team of experts in an industrious or scientific environment. For example a technical expert who supervises a large number of biologists and chemists in a pharmaceutical company how can cope with it without relevant knowledge. It is beyond of our minds if we imagine that a mechanic is able launches a satellite without any background in physic and mathematics.

In conclusion, in my point of view, we should not deny the role of both factors to be prosperous in career. I personally believe that we must make difference among the occupations. Definitely, nobody expects a labor to makes a scheme for building a giant structure like a tower.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Undoubtedly , in this world finding a proper job has ...
^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ample a technical expert who supervises a large number of biologists and chemists in a pharmaceut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rence among the occupations. Definitely, nobody expects a labor to makes a scheme...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uilding a giant structure like a tower.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08080808081 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10597798282 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8852620683 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187832294491 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569578982152 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589771805575 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994692152968 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760334560807 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.