The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005.
The given maps below illustrate the developments which took place during a period of 25 years in Youngsville village in New Zealand.
Overall, this maps reveals that the rural zone experienced hugely the changes as it turned into a complex urban area. In 1980, the city was much more greener than 2005 and some facilities were built.
On the north side of the river Alanah, just a vast number of trees was cut down and replaced by a park as just a few trees remained. Moreover, in the east the residential area was demolished and a railway constructed. Also, to the west of railway a stadium was erected and a park along with a parking was appeared.
On the south side of the river the developments were more remarkable as all houses and trees disappeared to make a way for building the skyscrapers. The woodland area was fully knocked down and two factories established next to the airport. In addition, a warehouse and an industrial zone were erected to the northwest of the airport. Finally, alongside the railroad a Marina center was constructed next to the station in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greener' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greener
... urban area. In 1980, the city was much more greener than 2005 and some facilities were buil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75661375661 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73928992672 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4330113895 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163086248863 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612113510992 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12117150983 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136289904036 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165305843029 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.