Governments spend millions of dollars each year in their space programmes. Most recently, Mars is the focus of scientists’ attention. Some people think this money would be better spent on dealing with problems closer to home.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Undoubtedly, numerous amount of money has invested in space explorations during the last century. This issue always has been one of the controversial issue weather we should do scientific research in this content or not. Well, it seems that people have different attitude toward this matter. This essay intends discuss about it as follows.
Firstly, about 50 years ago there was a competition between the US and the URSS in term of launching spacecraft to the space to conquer the moon. While a vast amount of budget gave to the space agency of these countries, it could be put into other sectors like education, culture, health, and agriculture. Fortunately, this rival has been less significantly when the other lands involved in this issue by establishing the relevant organizations including the EU which has played a significant role in astonishing findings.
Besides, the critics constantly argue that when a flood of people particularly in African lands suffer from some natural disasters like drought and the food supplies are running out it is not the right approach to insist on investigation about other planets. Still, the rate of illiteracy is relatively high and some global organizations can provide a platform to resolve this problem. The WHO and the FAO can perform rewarding attempts in poor countries when the wealthy governments donate millions of dollars like expanding the innovative techniques of seeding the corps into the soil.
In conclusion, in my opinion we need to balance between the money spent to space researches and whatever related the humans which improves the quality of their life at the moment. That is exactly the only way both side will be satisfied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e only way both side will be satisfied.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16304347826 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84315498096 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644927536232 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3339364006 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161313701668 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520120895806 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0162745534459 0.0667982634062 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881247027393 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138941971994 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.