The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features ,and make comaparisons where relevant.

The chart below illustrates the amount of water used for various functions in six areas of the universe.
Overall, more water was channeled into agriculture in all countries involved in the survey except North America and Europe who used more of their water for industrial activities. The reverse was the case for water utilised domestically, because Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia respectively used less water for this reason than North America, South America and Europe.
Central Asia exhausted most of their water (88%) on agricultural procedures, It was also noted that Africa and South East Asia channeled almost the same quantity (84% and 81% respectively) on this purpose. While there was a dramatic decline in the use of water agriculturally in North America and Europe (13% and 15% respectively).
On the other hand, North America and Europe spent more of their water on industrial activities (48% and 53% respectively) when compared to other regions who used minimal amount of their water industrially with a maximum of 12% being used for industrial works

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15517241379 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75687804153 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545977011494 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7633397903 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156368943715 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104257515594 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799644597261 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130739106323 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861663292334 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.