In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem?

Although agricultural advancement have seen an upshoot, numerous humans within the universe are experiencing starvation due to different factors that requires immediate and serious intervention.

Firstly, the significant increase in human population around the world have led to a substantial rise in demand for food ( agricultural outputs) for sustainability of life. This increase in food demand in turn causes inflation of price of agricultural products leaving the poor hungry while the rich conveniently affords the available agricultural products.

Secondly, in recent time, due to advancement in educational system and other personal reasons, a considerable number of people prefers white collar jobs which in practical sense are more comfortable and less demanding than careers in agriculture. This preference for office work to farming eventually causes a drastic decline in agriculturist, agricultural inputs and outputs, and hence a significant lower agricultural products for human consumption.

Thirdly, dramatic rise in human population is unanimously related to considerable increase in the demand for housing, therefore leading to compulsory and necessary brushing of bushes (which were previously used for agricultural activities) for construction of homes. These brushing of bushes/forests causes a drastic shortage of farmlands.
Additionally, lack of proper and adequate transport system have contributed to food inadequacy globally due to improper and considerably low road network. It is also pertinent to note that unavailability of storage system for agricultural products is a big dilemma faced by farmers as a number of their products deteriorates before getting to the final consumers. This factor not only affects the farmers but also the consumers as huge amount of foods meant for consumption ends up as waste.
All these challenges mitigating agriculture can be remedied by government, community and individual's interventions in agricultural systems through large scale and mechanised farming, agricultural subsidies, insurance, adequate and proper agricultural education in schools.

In conclusion, in spite of recent agricultural development, people around the world also starve due to factors such as increase in human population, preference for white collar jobs, lack of proper transport and storage system for agricultural products.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cing starvation due to different factors that requires immediate and serious inte...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to a substantial rise in demand for food agricultural outputs for sustainability ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, such as, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99705882353 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34650956932 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.065934088 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.916666667 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818615632476 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332425474877 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269025222009 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439123755214 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280210183502 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.