The first chart below illustrates energy usage in a normal Australian household. The second chart demonstrates the corresponding greenhouse gas emissions emanating from this energy usage.
Overall, Australian household spend more energy for heating purposes but emits more greenhouse gases through water heating.
In terms of energy usage, Australian household consumes almost half of their total energy (42%) on various activities that involves heating. This is closely followed by usage of energy for water heating procedures (30%). Energy spent on other appliances took 15% of Australian household energy consumption while people living in Australia consumed only a total of 13% of their energy on refrigeration, cooling and lighting.
On the other hand, although Australian household spend more energy on heating than on water heating, water heating generated more greenhouse gas (32% of the total emitted greenhouse gas).
This is greenhouse gas emissions is closely followed by gas emission by other appliances (28%). It is pertinent to note that greenhouse gas emissions exceeded energy usage in all usage categories except heating which emitted less gas (15%) when compared to usage (42%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...energy on heating than on water heating, water heating generated more greenhouse ...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... categories except heating which emitted less gas 15% when compared to usage 42%....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61111111111 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78707333556 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8231575289 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3116249001 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164969717234 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075515954443 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202502107488 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109604056573 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.