The chart below shows the percentage whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, with projections till 2050. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting and main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart elucidates the information about the comparison between the proportions of population in India, china, USA, Japan in 1950 to 2000 and also speculates the population in 2050.
Overall, it can be clearly seen from the portrayed figures that china had the maximum population in 1950 which is considered to be drop till 2050 and India will take a lead in population in predicted year and Japan had the least position in population which is expected to decrease in coming years.
By analyzing the figures it is clear that In 1950 China had little more than a quarter populations, which slumped just under a quarter in 2000 but still highest among other nations and predicted to be decrease to 19% in 2050. India projected the opposing trend to China, in 1950 it was at 15% and rose up to 19% in 2000 and will continue to escalate approximately to 21% in 2050.
By further scrutinizing the data, In USA the population was only one in ten in the year of 1950 and a depletion of 3% can be seen in 2000 which is estimated to remain static till 2050. The Japan articulate the least population proportion in 1950 up to 5% which continue to drop in 2000 and presents the least populated country among other countries with only 3% in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'population'?
Suggestion: population
...50 China had little more than a quarter populations, which slumped just under a quarter in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ntry among other countries with only 3% in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other countries with only 3% in future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62331838565 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64908202683 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47533632287 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2589330712 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.833333333 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1666666667 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222156361913 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12668015157 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482539052847 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152321399856 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468079367653 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.