The charts and pie show the number of students in a particular European university, the government annual spending on each student between 1984 and 2009 and the percentage of students according to there family's economic features and make comparison were relevent.
The given column, line and pie charts illustrate the student strength of a specific university of Europe, the yearly expenditure done by the government on each student and the proportion of students as per their family's financial status. A cursory glance at the graph is enough to make it clear that the number of students increased, whereas the government funding on them decreased From the column graph it is clear that 150,000 students studied at the university in 1984. This number increased with fluctuations and reached 400,000 by 2008. The line graph depicts that the government spent the maximum ($14,000) per student annually in 1984. This spending decreased gradually and reached $ 10,000/student by 2004. After that this funding increased and became 12,000 dollars by 2008. From the pie chart it is manifest that slightly more tha quarter came from low income families and slightly more than a fifth came from middle income families. half the students came from high income families. A little over Overall, the maximum students at university were from high income families. It is prising to see that more students came from low income than from middle income families.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 687, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$10'.
Suggestion: $10
...pending decreased gradually and reached $ 10,000/student by 2004. After that this fu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 942, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Half
...fifth came from middle income families. half the students came from high income fami...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11979166667 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55744493154 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.8653171252 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296553619496 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130107588594 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940970103765 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296553619496 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.