The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportions of Australian inhabitants who visited four recreational places namely, Zoo, the Library, the Theatre, and the Cinema.
Overall, the cinema is the most popular place to visit, while the theatre stood last. In all cases, the new migrants born in other countries are lower than other groups, expecting the library, which ranked first.
The theatre is not a favorite for all groups. The new migrants born in English-speaking countries are responsible for the biggest group in this place, followed by the native Australians. Moreover, the new migrants born in other countries ranked last. Similarly, the zoo has the same trend as the theatre with quite double percentages which shows more interest in people's opinion.
The cinema is responsible for the favorite place among which other groups with more than 50% for each kind of people. The native Australian and the new migrants born in English-speaking countries made up 70% and 62%, respectively. In contrast, the library has a completely different trend in comparison with the cinema. The new migrants born in other countries ranked first in this group. The new migrants born in English-speaking countries are bigger than the new migrants born in other countries by a margin of 2%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, similarly, so, while, in contrast, kind of, in all cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19417475728 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92494158063 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480582524272 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.33902439024 323% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1783898879 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0670582180435 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322304213832 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374143293371 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557152109011 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237231346843 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.