The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart compares Newtown people's weight into four groups namely, obese, overweight, ideal, and underweight in 2010.
Overall, the percentage of the ideal group is decreasing overages, while the percentage of obese is growing overages. In comparison with the two above-mentioned groups, there is no regular trend for overweight ages.
The ideal is responsible for 70% of the whole 20-29-year-olds group. In the next age group, the ideal is still ranked first, followed by overweight with 30%. In the 40-49-year-olds group, there is almost similarity among all groups, expecting underweight with lower than 5%. From the 50-59-year-olds group, the ideal group is not standing first anymore because the obese made up more than half of whole this age group, and also in this group, the underweight is almost near 0%. Moreover, the proportion of overweight is less than 5% as high as this this group in 20-29. In the last age group, the share of the ideal reach the lowest point with near 5%, and there is a significant increase for the overweight and the underweight which ranked second and third in this age group, respectively.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...entage of obese is growing overages. In comparison with the two above-mentioned groups, th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...f overweight is less than 5% as high as this this group in 20-29. In the last age group, ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93124233843 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534759358289 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.069363855 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0227068390692 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0140502169684 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299086965067 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0384029728956 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399516875036 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.