We live in a technology-focused world. All vehicles in the future will not have drivers so people just commute with them without driving. I believe in this case have more merits such as less accident risk, fewer opting out regulations, and more free time for all car passengers.
On the on hand, new technologies will bring us more benefits in driving. Unfortunately, many people succumb due to car accidents each year. The most ordinary reason for accidents is drivers' recklessness that which originates from mental or physical fatigue. Driverless cars equipped the artificial intelligence will solve this problem because their performance is fascinating and does not have common human errors. In addition, many people tend to opt out of rules when they come to driving. Undoubtedly, regulations play a crucial role in declining accidents statistics. Driverless automobiles will be programmable, thus decreasing the number of accidents thanks to artificial intelligence will be possible.
Furthermore, driving is a boring action for many people. With driverless vehicles, they will not have to drive, thus enjoying when the car is moving. For example, on a long journey, they have time to read a book thanks to auto-drive cars.
On the other hand, driving is an enjoyable activity for the car fanatic. Numerous people prefer to spend their spare time driving. When is possible, they get in their car and then go away on vacation or just go for a drive. Therefore, driverless cars cut the chance of their favorite hobby. Besides, each technology has flaws initially, even though it is cutting-edge. These drawbacks will appear during a period; consequently, there will be a high risk for passengers because they are being transported by an uncertain driver.
In conclusion, as above-mentioned, there are many advantages and disadvantages to the idea of the driverless vehicle that I believe demerits will overshadow by demerits in this case.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25723472669 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09928484112 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578778135048 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3430567378 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.75 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.55 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2677237154 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745315658126 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804190489656 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151849281294 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459873122893 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.